Monthly Archive: January 2010

This Week’s World’s Best Reader

Sometimes the folks who read my books turn out to be amazing, talented people themselves. Case in point: AMMSII from the forum, who sent me this:
Tempting Christ

Writes AMMSII: “The Electric Church influenced 2 songs for my band, and when we performed on mischief night, I had my keyboardist dress and act like one of the Monks. I’m the dude singing. One song is called Pusher, and it’s about the scene when Kev pushes the monk. The other song is like persuading people to join it.”

Hot shit, that looks like a band I’d like to go see. AMMSII also sent me this kick ass piece of audio, which is “?a reading from The Electric Church, page 122.” This kicks ass as well:

TEC Page 122 (with apologies to AMMSII as I reduced the quality to make it a better size for streaming etc).

Wow! I’m amazed.

Stapler porn

For those of you who make print zines, this might appeal. After switching to a double biannual issue, I found that my trusty old Stanley long reach stapler couldn’t hack it any more. Sadly, I had to replace it with . . . this:

MONSTER STAPLER

Monster Stapler can destroy worlds with its awesome power. And possibly staple my hand to my thigh if I try to make zines drunk.

The Five People You Meet in the Laundromat

Hey gang: This is a little essay that appeared in my local newspaper a few years ago. I wrote a number of these for the fun of it back in the day, so I thought I’d just repost a few.

THERE are few indignities associated with city living more consistently aggravating than the laundromat experience. Dragging your soiled linens to the laundromat is sort of like adult acne: Something you were promised you wouldn’t have to deal with once you graduated school and grew up a little, but which persists in afflicting you well into your middle age. The salt in the wounds in the New York City area, of course, is that we’re all paying ridiculous amounts of money for our tiny, cramped dwellings, and still must carry our weighty sacks of laundry to the coin-op laundry. I have, in the past, attempted to register my protest of such conditions by refusing to do laundry at all, but this proved unpopular with my coworkers, friends, and wife, and I was forced to relent.

If laundromats were glorious, sunny places you could enjoy going to, it wouldn’t be so bad, but let’s face it, laundromats—at least the ones around me—are sort of hygiene gulags, tiny, drab, and crowded. Also, often damp. Every laundromat I’ve ever been in has been uniformly depressing: Grey and featureless, with leaking machines, crowds of angry people, and sad, minimalist vending machines. When you arrive, sweaty and wearing your emergency underwear (sometimes, wearing only your emergency underwear, if it’s a real emergency), the scene that greets you is not exactly inspiring. Neither are the people you rub elbows with while trying to scrub the shame out of your clothing.

Societal breakdown is never far away in cities; too many people plus not enough space equals simmering tempers and revenge fantasies. In the laundromats you have an ill-advised further concentration, crowding people into a small, resource-starved space—it isn’t long before a Lord of the Flies scenario erupts over the possession and use of the washers and dryers. Under such stresses, the true nature of people is revealed. Some writers would hesitate to boldly categorize the entire human race into a handful of generalizations, but not me: There are five types of people you meet in the laundromat. Not six, not four, but five:

The Brood Leader: Invariably there will be people who, for one reason or another, must bring their entire family with them to the laundromat. Nothing wrong with this, of course, and many people have no other choice—the laundry’s got to be done, and the kids can’t be allowed to burn the house down while you’re out doing it. Aside from the cloud of children swarming around them, you can identify these poor souls by the flat look in their eyes that hints that a lost child or two wouldn’t bother them too much.

Single Guy:We all know this guy. Heck, I was this guy. Charmingly clueless, he arrives with laundry in a plastic garbage bag, recklessly purchases soap and bleach from the ancient vending machine in the corner, mixes whites and colors, and overstuffs the washer so it explodes into suds and water that covers the floor in a pinkish, slippery film. Inexplicably, he never returns to claim his clothing.

The Relativity Theorist: The worst part of spending time in a laundromat is spending time there, of course, and this brainy customer isn’t afraid to bend the laws of physics to their will in a bid to reduce their sentence. Noting that lots of laundry crammed into one or two dryers will take a few quarter-driven cycles to completely dry, they spread their laundry out amongst as many dryers as possible—the ultimate goal being one article of clothing per dryer—in hopes of getting out of there after a single twenty-minute cycle. And more power to them.

Angry Angry Territorialist: Ever walked into a laundromat and found every washer or dryer occupied—a large number of which have stopped? After waiting a polite period of time, you start investigating, seeking to claim one of these units for your own use. The exact length of that “polite period of time” is a subjective matter, of course, but no matter how long you wait, at some point you will place your hands on the washer or dryer containing the clothing of The Territorialist, who will appear as if out of thin air and demand to know what you think you’re doing. No matter how long they’ve let their laundry languish, it is their firm belief that while their laundry resides inside a washer or dryer, they in some sense own that washer or dryer, and heaven help you if you trespass on their property.

The Quiet Professional: Once in a great while it is the honor of every laundromat refugee to witness an awe-inspiring display of laundry-management that puts the rest of us to shame. Someone will come in and so competently manage the washers and dryers that they’re preparing to exit from the laundromat while you’re still trying to remember which washer actually contains your clothing. They crisply smooth, fold, and hang their clothes on some sort of semi-professional laundry-transportation device that makes your college-era duffel bag look foolish in comparison, and march out of the building with a confident, no-nonsense stride that says “I am going home to starch and iron, fools!”

It’s enough to make you contemplate slinking home and doing your wash in the kitchen sink. Which I would not recommend, by the way, unless you really are down to your emergency underwear and nothing else.

Lost: The End

My god, this actually happened:

The other night, after dinner, my wife was puttering down on the first floor with the TV on in the background, and the execrable show I Get That a Lot came on. If you have never encountered this, um, program, it goes like this: The producers find some celebrity – say, everyone’s favorite accused murderer Snoop Dogg – and have them pretend to work at some normal job, like gas station attendant or sandwich maker. When people tell Snoop that he looks like Snoop, Snoop makes a joke and says “I get that a lot.” Whoo, it sure sound funny, don’t it?

After a while I went downstairs to join her for some light television watching, and she casually unpaused the TV and sat down. I stood there for a moment, stunned.

“Wait,” I stuttered. “We’re watching this? That unpausing was serious?”

It was: To my horror, my wife thinks I Get That a Lot is hilarious.

This is one reason I can’t wait for Lost to return – so I can avoid moments like that. Lost ain’t a perfect show, but it’s an interesting one, and I’m personally very excited to have some smart SF back on TV. There’s more and more SF with big budgets on TV and on the movie screens these days, but a lot of it just isn’t very smart, in my opinion – sort of like the movie Avatar. There’s a science fiction concept there at the core, but it’s mainly used to tell a story that completely – you might say purposefully – ignores the implications and consequences of that concept in favor of telling a much more conventional story. The central SF ideas in Avatar, for example – the Avatar technology itself, Pandora, the ecologic, economic, and social situation on a future earth that drives everything else – are completely ignored. Completely. Basically, the movie says, hey, here’s avatar technology, where we grow an alien body with some human genes implanted and then a human gets in this tube and bam! the human can operate the alien body as if it’s his or her own. And you stop and start to ask a question about that and the movie makes a face and says “Moving on, here are some action sequences and romantic subplots and obvious villains whose demise you will get to cheer later when they are killed in poetic ways!”

Anyway. . .

This is the final season of Lost, and it’s going to be one of those rare TV shows that gets to have an actual, planned-for ending. Most TV shows in America, of course, limp along until absolutely no one is watching and then just turn off midstream like they never existed in the first place, and this is usually true even concerning serials with ongoing stories – which is one reason why the networks prefer shows like the Law & Order franchise, which has no ongoing arc plots and thus can be shown more or less randomly without eroding the audience. But Lost will escape that fate, which is good, but this also puts the show on the precipice, because despite six seasons of (presumably) intriguing plots, funny moments, delicious mysteries, and fine performances, the legacy of the show is going to hinge on its ending. In other words, if the ending sucks, that’s all anyone will ever remember about Lost.

When I was in college, my friends and I discovered the old TV show The Prisoner, which was recently desecrated by a new version no one wanted or watched. Originally aired in 1967 in the US (I think) we discovered it some decades later and it blew our minds. We were mildly obsessed with it for a while. But I’ll tell you: If you mention it in mixed company and anyone actually knows what you’re talking about, all you’ll hear about is the incomprehensible mind-trip of an ending, which outraged viewers at the time and continues to anger people to this day. The ending of The Prisoner is possibly the single most baffling climax of any TV show, ever, and it is the show’s main legacy at this point. As another example, consider St. Elsewhere; the only thing most people truly remember about that show is the bizarre ending (if you’re not familiar with it, you ought to be). The ending to St. Elsewhere has even sparked an ongoing theory about its narrative as related to other TV shows. No one talks about the show any more, but people are still talking about the ending.

So, Lost is up against it this year. The ending could be brilliant, it could be dull, disappointing, baffling, or simply weird. Who knows? I’ll be there, delighted to find out, and then we can begin discussing it. Or, in the worst case scenario, not discussing it. because the worst thing they could do with that show is have an expected, conventional ending that everyone watches, shrugs at, and walks away from searching for a snack.

Question of the Week

Recently, the Illuminati (Hoboken Chapter) decided to bless my little town with a movie theater. It’s not huge (5 screens) and it’s located on the butt end of town right under the shadow of the world’s rustiest overpass, but hot damn, a real-life movie theater in walking distance! The last time I had a movie theater I could even theoretically walk to I was 12 and sneaking in R-rated movies in the State Theater in Journal Square, Jersey City. Since then it’s been a depressing series of suburban and mall gigaplexes, swamped with shitkickers and a good half hour’s drive under ideal conditions. So: HOT DAMN, a real-life movie theater!

As a result, The Duchess and I have gone to several movies recently that we would not have seen until pay-per-view some months from now. The modern moviegoing experience is tragic: Overpriced, overcrowded, and stuffed full of kids who have more money to spend in one Saturday night than I had my entire childhood. Bitter? Not me. I just despise children. Don’t hold it against me.

So we don’t make it out to too many movies these days, trying to avoid sitting in a darkened room with assholes. We’ve tried going to movies at 10AM, but this just replaces young assholes with elderly assholes. Trust me: The whole world is populated with assholes, and assholes ruin everything. But the fact that we can walk to the Hoboken theater is too great a lure, and we’ve seen 2012, Avatar, Sherlocke Holmes, and It’s Complicated there within the last month. That’s a record for us. And we only had one asshole moment in those four movies (a group of kids who found their conversation too delightful to end, but they were literally stared into terrified silence by a man a few rows down from them). I can guarantee you we wouldn’t have seen 3 of those movies if we’d been forced to gas up the car and drive to them.

So here’s my Question for the Week: If you suddenly had super evil SuperVillain powers (or, why not, SuperHero powers) would you a) actually put your time and energy into dominating/destroying/saving/protecting the world, or would you just spend your time making a nice fortune and possibly turning loud kids in theaters into toads?

Me, I’ve never understood the assumption that people who develop super powers of some sort (either genetic, magical, or technological) would immediately give up their lives of desperate labor to take up . . . desperate lives of labor. I mean, taking over the world is tough work: You have to seize trillions in assets, hire yourself an army and staff it properly, monitor your minions for betrayal, build underwater bases – whew, I’m exhausted just thinking about it.  Now, I can better understand superheroism once the Super Villain is in place: I can imagine someone with psychic powers just making a nice comfortable life for themselves until a Super Villain starts mucking everything up, and then, after a good nap and a sandwich, the Super Hero decides, well, this guy’s ruining my stock portfolio, better take him down. But the Super Villainy just mystifies me. Not the idea of using your powers for your own gain, but the idea of putting so much drama into it. Why not just use your powers to start a really cool Ponzi scheme?

Sure, everyone likes to picture themselves in a cool costume, lording it over an army of redshirts, but the work, man, the work involved! I mean, if I can use my super evil powers to get free drinks at the local bar, all well and good. But administrating a mercenary army of thousands? Who wants the headaches? And then, after it’s all said and done, what have you accomplished, really? You’ve made yourself CEO of a corporation. An evil corporation, sure, but a corporation nonetheless. I’d rather nap in the afternoons.